Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Whiting conflates acting in accordance with a meaning-rul... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Whiting's defense of semantic obligations via the possibility of criticizing a speaker who misapplies an expression out of mere desire is not convincing

    Whiting conflates acting in accordance with a meaning-rule with acting correctly by that rule's normative standard (cf. Boghossian's distinction in 'The Rule-Following Considerations').

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Boghossian(as a modern philosopher defending a specific theory about knowledge)
    Paul Boghossian is a contemporary philosopher who studies knowledge and meaning; he defends the idea that some sentences are true just by understanding what the words mean.
    Conflates(in argumentation and logic)
    Treats two different things as if they're the same thing, or mixes them up in a way that causes confusion.
    The Rule-Following Considerations(in philosophy of language)
    A famous set of arguments (originally by Ludwig Wittgenstein, developed by Saul Kripke) questioning how we can ever follow a rule correctly if we just have it in our minds.
    Whiting(the subject of the critique being made)
    A contemporary philosopher who has written about how we follow rules and what it means to act according to them.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    acting correctly by that rule's normative standard(the other thing being confused; 'normative' means it's about how things should be done)
    Doing something in the right or proper way according to what a rule requires or expects—not just following the rule mechanically, but following it *well*.
    acting in accordance with a meaning-rule(one of two things being confused together)
    Doing something in a way that matches what a rule says or means—like following the instructions on a recipe.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Whiting's defense of semantic obligations via the possibility of criticizing a s...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective