Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Wholehearted endorsement tracks rational coherence with one's deepest commitments, not consistency with one's happiness.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Our deepest commitments often *are* shaped by what produces happiness; divorcing them creates false dichotomies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Persistent unhappiness signals potential incoherence in commitments themselves, not virtuous sacrifice of shallow pleasure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Wholehearted endorsement without happiness satisfaction suggests those commitments weren't truly deepest or most rational.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Happiness often reflects fleeting desires or social conditioning rather than authentic values we've critically examined.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A life aligned with core commitments has integrity even when painful, whereas happiness-chasing can involve self-betrayal.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rational coherence with commitments provides stable grounds for endorsement; happiness fluctuates with circumstances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.