Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Wide variation in religious beliefs about God's nature is compatible with worthiness of worship being the sole defining feature of God.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Worthiness of worship presupposes specific divine attributes (omnipotence, moral perfection) that constrain rather than permit arbitrary variation in God-concepts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A being worthy of unconditional worship must possess maximal greatness, and maximal greatness has determinate content that rules out many religious conceptions of God.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The supporting argument conflates variation in worship practices with variation in the object of worship, treating them as equivalent when they are logically distinct.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Anselm's tradition establishes that 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived' converges on a unique concept, making wide doctrinal variation evidence against a single worthy object, not compatibility with one.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Forms of worship vary widely across religions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If worthiness of worship is the defining feature of God, beliefs about what God is like can still vary as widely as worship practices vary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.