Skip to content

Topics Thinkers Changes ContributorsLoading account…

Carmelics

A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

Navigate

Topics
Search
Recent Changes
Contribute
How It Works
Glossary
Thinkers
Contributors
About
Statistics
Terms
Privacy

Database

Statements: —
Perspectives: —
Topics: —

Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

Made within

DC&

Austin

Statements: 321,452
Perspectives: 108,905
Topics: 42

Home/Original/inverse

Inverse View

It is not the case that William James argues in The Varieties of Religious Experience that genuine religious awe involves a felt sense of presence of a distinct, responsive personal reality beyond the self.

?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

?

1.Phenomenological reports of 'felt presence' can result from neurological states, memory patterns, or psychological projection without external reality.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.James conflates the psychological force of an experience with evidence for an actual distinct reality beyond the self.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Reasons Against

1 perspective

Reason against

?

1.James's empirical method prioritizes first-person accounts, which consistently report encounters with reality felt as external and responsive.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.A felt presence of distinct otherness explains why religious experiences produce transformative effects unavailable through mere self-reflection.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.Personal responsiveness—the sense of being addressed or answered—distinguishes genuine religious experience from impersonal natural awe.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Strongest counterpoint

Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.