Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Williamson's argument that justified false belief license... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→JNA (Justification Norm of Assertion) is preferable to KNA as a norm of assertion

    Williamson's argument that justified false belief licenses 'I should assert p' yet also 'p is false' reveals that JNA permits constitutively defective assertions, not merely unlucky ones.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Assert/Assertion(as the act of making a claim in the statement)
    When you state something as a fact or claim it's true. For example, saying 'It's raining' is an assertion, while asking 'Is it raining?' is not.
    Constitutively defective(describing assertions that are fundamentally problematic)
    Flawed in a way that goes against the very nature or purpose of the thing itself—like a 'broken promise' where the act itself contains a contradiction.
    JNA(Proposed as an alternative to KNA that handles unlucky and Gettiered cases without appeal to independent epistemic standards)
    Justification Norm of Assertion: a norm holding that an assertion is appropriate only if the asserter is justified in believing the asserted proposition
    Justified false belief(describing a type of belief state in epistemology)
    A belief that you have good reasons to hold, but that turns out to be incorrect anyway—like being confident in a wrong answer on a test based on solid reasoning.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Unlucky(contrasting with 'constitutively defective' assertions)
    In this context, accidentally wrong through bad circumstance rather than through some fundamental problem—like guessing correctly on a test by accident.
    Williamson
    # Williamson Williamson most commonly refers to Timothy Williamson, a prominent British philosopher known for his work on knowledge, logic, and language. He's influential in contemporary philosophy for arguing that knowledge is more fundamental than belief and that traditional definitions of knowledge may be too restrictive. His ideas have shaped how philosophers think about what it means to know something and how language relates to reality.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    JNA (Justification Norm of Assertion) is preferable to KNA as a norm of assertio...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective