Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Withholding assent from compelling impressions may requir... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Marcus's injunction to 'erase' impressions means to override inadequate impressions by replacing them with impressions better grounded in a comprehension of reality.

    Withholding assent from compelling impressions may require countering those impressions with other, better-grounded impressions.

    SkepticismVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    3 topics

    Perception3 linkedConsciousness & Mind

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    2 linked
    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Impressions are involuntary in the moment, so 'erase' cannot mean simply wiping ...Making a second impression may itself be the means of erasing the first.Marcus's injunction to 'erase' impressions means to override inadequate impressi...Plato's Protagoras similarly speaks of rendering the power of appearance unautho...

    Similar

    Although impressions are involuntary in the moment, they are subject t...85%One should only assent to a cognitive impression when there are absolu...82%Cognitive impressions can be indistinguishable from false impressions ...82%Cognitive impressions can be subjectively indistinguishable from false...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: marcus-aurelius
    View source passageHide passage
    This last use of ‘providence or atoms’ shows that since Marcus is writing to effect certain psychological attitudes in himself, we have to look to context to determine what the desired attitude is, and then determine how the things he tells himself are supposed to effect the attitude. Perhaps bringing about the desired attitude calls for making hyperbolic statements in order to correct for some natural tendency he thinks he has. If we do not keep this in mind as we read Marcus, we will only find

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective