Without a common biological and rational baseline, the communicative reciprocity that grounds non-oppressive social contracts becomes structurally impossible between humans and post-humans.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Structurally impossible(as used in logic and philosophy of language): Something that cannot work or happen because of how things are fundamentally built or organized—it's impossible by design, not just by accident.
biological baseline(as used in philosophy of communication): The shared physical traits and needs that all humans have in common, like having bodies, needing food, and aging—the idea being that these similarities help us understand each other.
communicative reciprocity(as used in philosophy of communication and ethics): The ability to have a real two-way conversation where both people can genuinely understand each other and respond meaningfully.
non-oppressive(as used in ethics and political philosophy): Fair and respectful in a way that doesn't unfairly control, dominate, or harm one group of people for the benefit of another.

Based on where you are in your exploration