Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Without a government, there are no objectively defined laws. — Carmelics
    Home/Social Contract
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Without a government, individuals lack objectively defined laws, and therefore the boundaries of their property rights are unclear.

    Without a government, there are no objectively defined laws.

    Social Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Social Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty2 linked

    Related

    Individuals in a state of nature do not have a government.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Social Contract
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Without a government, individuals lack objectively defined laws, and therefore t...
    Without objectively defined laws, the boundaries of property rights are unclear.

    Similar

    Without a government, individuals lack objectively defined laws, and t...84%Rand and Ghate hold that individuals without a government cannot produ...81%Rand and Ghate's view that government is necessary for objective law i...76%Human laws exist because they are enacted by a legitimate authority (l...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ayn-rand
    View source passageHide passage
    Onkar Ghate (2019) and Harry Binswanger (2019) both defend this view. Ghate uses two scenarios involving individuals in a state of nature. Suppose you are by yourself on a desert island, and you domesticate a pig. Then someone from a neighboring tribe steals it. Do you have a right to retaliate by stealing some of his property, or stealing from his relatives? Again, suppose Robinson Crusoe and Friday are strangers sharing an island, and Crusoe invents a superior spear. Does Friday have a right t

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective