Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Without a plurality of forms, the metaphysical status of ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A plurality of substantial forms must be posited to avoid metaphysical incongruities.

    Without a plurality of forms, the metaphysical status of the corpse and the living body cannot be coherently distinguished.

    Afterlife & DeathPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & DeathPersonal Identity

    Related

    A plurality of substantial forms must be posited to avoid metaphysical incongrui...A single substantial form cannot account for the persistence of a numerically id...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If Scotus does not acknowledge a forma corporeitatis over and above th...80%A plurality of substantial forms must be posited to avoid metaphysical...78%The union of body and soul can be explained by identifying the soul as...76%If persons and physical bodies differed in how their identity works, t...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: duns-scotus
    View source passageHide passage
    To Scotus and many of his fellow Franciscans it therefore seemed obvious that we need to posit a plurality of substantial forms to avoid these metaphysical incongruities. One standard form of such pluralism postulated a “form of the body” (forma corporeitatis) that makes a given parcel of matter to be a definite, unique, individual organism, and the “animating form” or soul, which makes that body alive. At death, the animating soul ceases to vivify the body, but numerically the same body remains

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective