Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Without coherent simultaneity between God's atemporal perspective and our temporal acts, the Boethian dissolution loses its explanatory foundation.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
God's knowledge of temporal facts need not depend on simultaneity; atemporal knowledge of all moments may be primitive and underivable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The demand for 'coherent simultaneity' may be a confused requirement—atemporal and temporal modes may be fundamentally incommensurable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Alternative frameworks (like open theism or presentism) dissolve the problem without requiring God to access our acts through simultaneity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Boethius's solution requires God to know temporal facts. Without coherent simultaneity, God's knowledge cannot relate to our acts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God's atemporal perspective cannot genuinely connect to temporal events, the claim that God knows our acts becomes metaphysically vacuous.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Coherent simultaneity preserves divine omniscience while avoiding causal determinism—removing it undermines the entire Boethian framework.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.