Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Without control as a criterion, collective responsibility becomes indistinguishable from strict liability, which most moral theorists reject as a basis for genuine blameworthiness rather than mere compensatory obligation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Groups can exercise control through institutional decision-making even when individuals lack alternatives.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Some collective harms warrant responsibility assignments independent of individual control, for social repair.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Strict liability and blameworthiness are separable concepts; control distinguishes them without being necessary for both.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral blame requires agents capable of having done otherwise; strict liability imposes blame regardless of capacity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Collective responsibility without control criteria punishes innocent group members, violating fairness principles.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Distinguishing blame from compensation requires control; otherwise moral accountability collapses into insurance schemes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.