Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Without empirical confirmation that photographic memory suppression causally produced language capacity, the supporting argument commits a post hoc fallacy.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Causal claims about cognitive evolution require inference, not just empirical confirmation—some mechanisms are unobservable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Post hoc applies to unsupported causal claims; if the argument includes plausible mechanistic reasoning, it avoids the fallacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Demanding empirical confirmation of prehistoric cognitive changes sets an unreasonably high evidentiary standard for all evolutionary hypotheses.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Post hoc fallacy requires assuming temporal sequence proves causation without independent causal mechanism evidence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
No neurobiological studies demonstrate photographic memory suppression directly enabled symbolic abstraction capacity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Alternative explanations exist: language arose from social coordination needs independent of memory system changes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.