Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Without external standards, there's no principled way to ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The demand for an external ultimate standard conflates the logical structure of justification with the actual deliberative structure of moral reasoning.

    Without external standards, there's no principled way to resolve moral disagreements or explain why some deliberative processes yield objective truths while others yield illusions.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Deliberative processes(as used in decision-making and agency)
    The thinking and reasoning you do when you're considering different options and deciding what to do.
    External standards(as used in philosophy of science)
    Reference points or measurements from outside a system that you use to check or calibrate something—like using a known distance to calibrate a measuring tool.
    Illusions(in perception and epistemology)
    Experiences where your senses trick you into perceiving something that isn't actually there or is different from reality—like seeing a mirage in the desert or a magic trick.
    moral disagreements(in ethics)
    Situations where people disagree about what's right and wrong, like whether it's okay to lie or steal.
    objective truths

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (in philosophy of knowledge)
    Facts that are true regardless of what anyone believes—like 'water boils at 100°C'—not just true for one person or group.
    principled way(describes reasoning that follows a logical foundation rather than guesswork)
    A method or approach that is based on clear, consistent rules or values—not just arbitrary choices.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    The demand for an external ultimate standard conflates the logical structure of ...

    Related

    The demand for an external ultimate standard conflates the logical structure of ...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective