Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Without intuitions of this kind, the convergence argument... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The convergence argument requires moral intuitions about specific idealised cases to function

    Without intuitions of this kind, the convergence argument cannot get off the ground

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Parfit tests competing versions of contractualism against intuitions regarding s...The convergence argument requires moral intuitions about specific idealised case...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The convergence argument requires moral intuitions about specific idea...85%The convergence argument is modest in its aims84%The convergence argument is of limited relevance to contractualists wh...79%The convergence argument adopts a more impersonal formulation of contr...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: contractualism
    View source passageHide passage
    There is a methodological issue here. In his presentation of the convergence argument, Parfit tests competing versions of contractualism against intuitions regarding specific idealised cases. This is not a peculiarity of Parfit’s own presentation. Without intuitions of this kind, the convergence argument cannot get off the ground. Proponents of individualist formulations of contractualism might reply that, in some key cases, Parfit’s intuitions are not neutral benchmarks, but rather reflect the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective