Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Without quantified predicates, 'All humans are mortal' en... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Jones must endorse Hamilton's view that predicates are quantified in order to retain the thesis that significant assertion is the assertion of an identity

    Without quantified predicates, 'All humans are mortal' entails the nonsensical 'Mortals are all humans'

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Jones must endorse Hamilton's view that predicates are quantified in order to re...Jones's core thesis requires that significant assertions be interpretable as ide...With quantified predicates, the entailed consequence 'Some mortals are all human...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    If the predicate in 'All humans are mortal' is quantified, the proposi...95%With quantified predicates, the entailed consequence 'Some mortals are...90%'Some mortals are all humans' asserts that some subset of mortals is i...83%The consequence 'Some mortals are all humans' is at least intelligible...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: emily-elizabeth-constance-jones
    View source passageHide passage
    The endorsement of Hamilton’s view might seem perverse—and, in fact, Jones is elsewhere critical of his view (1906, 35–6)—but it is necessary if Jones is to retain the view that significant assertion is, at root, the assertion of an identity. After all, if ‘All humans are mortal’ asserts an identity, then, given that identity is commutative, it entails the apparently nonsensical ‘Mortals are all humans.’ The result is at least intelligible if we suppose that the predicate is also quantified—if,

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective