Without semantic weight in the copula itself, the distinction between essential and accidental predication reduces to extra-linguistic metaphysics, contradicting Fârâbî's linguistic methodology.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
The word 'is' that links subject and predicate in a proposition, though not strictly necessary since word order could serve the same function
essential predication(Distinguished from accidental and intentional predication by having quiddities as truth-makers.)
Predication in which the predicate expresses a definitional or quidditative part of the subject's essence, independent of whether instances of the subject actually exist.
semantic weight(as a linguistic concept)
The amount of meaning a word carries on its own; a word with high semantic weight means something specific by itself, while one with low semantic weight mainly serves to connect other words.