Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Without specifying those principles, the construction can... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Bergson-Samuelson approach is incomplete because it lacks specific justification for the fairness principles underlying the utility construction.

    Without specifying those principles, the construction cannot be fully evaluated or applied.

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justice & Punishment
    1 linked

    Related

    Bergson and Samuelson did not specify which fairness principles justify construc...The Bergson-Samuelson approach is incomplete because it lacks specific justifica...

    Similar

    These two principles cannot both be satisfied simultaneously in the Ri...77%Reinhold's principles are insufficient to derive even the most basic r...77%Such principles cannot be obtained by an accumulation of observations76%Therefore, a principle that no one can reasonably reject is a principl...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: economic-justice
    View source passageHide passage
    Bergson (1938) and Samuelson (1947, 1981) occupy a special position, which may be described as a third way between old and new welfare economics. From the former, they retain the goal of making complete and consistent social welfare judgments with the help of well-defined social welfare functions. The formula W(U1(x),…,Un(x)) is often named a “Bergson-Samuelson social welfare function” (x is the social state; Ui(x), for i=1,…,n, is individual i’s utility in this state). With the latter, however,

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective