Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Wittgenstein's later work shows that meaning in language ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Crowdsourced general knowledge still requires natural language processing to produce formal statements

    Wittgenstein's later work shows that meaning in language is constituted by use within shared practices, not by formal translation from informal to formal registers.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Children acquire language by participating in everyday practices (games, rituals), not by memorizing formal rules or translations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The same formal expression means differently across contexts: 'fire!' differs in a theater versus military drill, revealing use-dependence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Formal systems cannot be self-interpreting; applying rules always requires judgment within a community of practitioners.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Mathematical and logical notation demonstrates meaning stability across contexts independent of local practice or speaker community.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If meaning were purely constituted by use, radical translation between languages would be impossible, yet it clearly succeeds pragmatically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Some meaningful expressions (e.g., counterfactuals, indexicals) require reference to external conditions beyond shared practices alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Children acquire language by participating in everyday practices (games, rituals...Crowdsourced general knowledge still requires natural language processing to pro...Formal systems cannot be self-interpreting; applying rules always requires judgm...If meaning were purely constituted by use, radical translation between languages...
    +3 moreShow less
    Mathematical and logical notation demonstrates meaning stability across contexts...Some meaningful expressions (e.g., counterfactuals, indexicals) require referenc...The same formal expression means differently across contexts: 'fire!' differs in...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit