Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Wittgenstein's notion of 'hinge propositions' in On Certa... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Epistemic relativism cannot be coherently formulated.

    Wittgenstein's notion of 'hinge propositions' in On Certainty reveals that some epistemic commitments must function as absolute anchors, undermining the relativist's claim that all justification is framework-internal.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Epistemic commitments(describing the foundational assumptions required for logical reasoning)
    The basic beliefs or assumptions we have to accept in order to think and reason at all—things we're essentially committed to believing.
    Framework-internal(how relativists think justification works)
    Something that only makes sense or is true within a particular system of beliefs or way of thinking, rather than being true no matter what system you use.
    Hinge propositions(the role these beliefs play in our knowledge system)
    Fundamental beliefs that act like the 'hinge' of a door—they're so basic that we rely on them to evaluate everything else, and we can't really justify them without circular reasoning.
    On Certainty(The specific philosophical work being referenced)
    A book Wittgenstein wrote near the end of his life that explores what we can be absolutely sure about and how certainty actually works in real life, rather than just in theory.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Relativism (or relativist claim)(the opposing position being challenged)
    The philosophical view that truth, knowledge, or meaning isn't absolute but depends entirely on a person's or culture's perspective—basically that there's no universal standard.
    Wittgenstein
    Ludwig Wittgenstein was an Austrian-British philosopher who fundamentally changed how people think about language and meaning in the 20th century. He argued that many philosophical problems arise from misunderstanding how words actually work in everyday life, rather than from deep metaphysical mysteries. His ideas influenced not just philosophy but also mathematics, logic, and even how people approach psychology and artificial intelligence today.
    justification(Third condition of the tripartite account of knowledge)
    The condition on a knower's belief that excludes mere luck — the belief must be held in a way that is appropriate or warranted, not merely accidentally correct.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Epistemic relativism cannot be coherently formulated.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective