Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' establishes that our most f... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Unshakable conviction in the face of serious, well-thought-out challenges is the criterion for truth

    Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' establishes that our most foundational convictions function as hinges—they are not doubted, but this is a structural feature of language-games, not evidence of truth.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Doubt requires a framework of accepted background beliefs; infinite regress proves foundational certainties must be structurally undoubted.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Language-games are constitutively defined by their rules; hinge propositions function as rules, not truth-claims requiring justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Our actual epistemic practice shows we never justify basic convictions like 'I have a body'—we simply use them as operational foundations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If hinges are merely structural features of language-games, their stability across all human cultures suggests they track objective reality, not convention.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The distinction between 'not doubted' and 'structurally undoubted' may be artificial; hinge-convictions' universal indubitability implies evidential weight.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Wittgenstein equivocates between pragmatic indispensability and semantic emptiness; functional necessity arguably constitutes weak evidence of truth.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Language-games(the framework that bedrock certainties structure)
    Wittgenstein's idea that language works like a game with its own rules—different situations (like asking for directions vs. telling a joke) have different 'rules' for how words are used.
    On Certainty(The specific philosophical work being referenced)
    A book Wittgenstein wrote near the end of his life that explores what we can be absolutely sure about and how certainty actually works in real life, rather than just in theory.
    Structural feature(as what the statement claims configuration-space separation is)
    A fundamental, built-in aspect of how something works—as opposed to something that just happens to occur by chance.
    Wittgenstein
    Ludwig Wittgenstein was an Austrian-British philosopher who fundamentally changed how people think about language and meaning in the 20th century. He argued that many philosophical problems arise from misunderstanding how words actually work in everyday life, rather than from deep metaphysical mysteries. His ideas influenced not just philosophy but also mathematics, logic, and even how people approach psychology and artificial intelligence today.
    evidence of truth(what the non-doubting of hinges is NOT)
    Proof or reasons that show something is actually correct or matches reality.
    foundational convictions(the core assumptions discussed)
    The basic beliefs we use to figure out everything else—the starting assumptions we don't usually question, like 'the ground is solid' or 'other people exist.'
    hinges(Wittgenstein's epistemology; from On Certainty)
    Fundamental principles so basic that they do not require argumentative support and instead serve as the fixed points on which inquiry and reasoning turn.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Doubt requires a framework of accepted background beliefs; infinite regress prov...If hinges are merely structural features of language-games, their stability acro...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Language-games are constitutively defined by their rules; hinge propositions fun...
    Our actual epistemic practice shows we never justify basic convictions like 'I h...
    +3 moreShow less
    The distinction between 'not doubted' and 'structurally undoubted' may be artifi...Unshakable conviction in the face of serious, well-thought-out challenges is the...Wittgenstein equivocates between pragmatic indispensability and semantic emptine...