Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' shows that hinge propositio... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→You do know that you have hands, despite being unable to discriminate between having hands and being a brain-in-a-vat.

    Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' shows that hinge propositions like 'I have hands' are not subject to doubt within the language-game of empirical inquiry, making skeptical challenges category errors.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Category error(as used in logic and philosophy of language)
    A logical mistake where you apply a rule or concept to something it doesn't actually fit, like using a math formula on a poem.
    Empirical inquiry(as used in epistemology)
    The process of learning about the world through observation, experience, and evidence gathered through our senses or experiments.
    Hinge propositions(the role these beliefs play in our knowledge system)
    Fundamental beliefs that act like the 'hinge' of a door—they're so basic that we rely on them to evaluate everything else, and we can't really justify them without circular reasoning.
    On Certainty(The specific philosophical work being referenced)
    A book Wittgenstein wrote near the end of his life that explores what we can be absolutely sure about and how certainty actually works in real life, rather than just in theory.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Skeptical challenges(as the type of arguments Descartes studied)
    Arguments that question whether we can really trust or know something—in this case, whether our senses actually show us what's real.
    Wittgenstein
    Ludwig Wittgenstein was an Austrian-British philosopher who fundamentally changed how people think about language and meaning in the 20th century. He argued that many philosophical problems arise from misunderstanding how words actually work in everyday life, rather than from deep metaphysical mysteries. His ideas influenced not just philosophy but also mathematics, logic, and even how people approach psychology and artificial intelligence today.
    language-game(Wittgenstein's late philosophy; German term Sprachspiel)
    A conception of linguistic meaning as dependent on the way words are used within particular situations or activities

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    You do know that you have hands, despite being unable to discriminate between ha...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective