Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Wittgenstein's private language argument implies that qua... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Interpersonal comparisons of qualia do not make sense

    Wittgenstein's private language argument implies that qualia concepts derive their meaning from public, interpersonal linguistic practices.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Wittgenstein argues we cannot privately ostensively define sensations; meaning requires public criteria of correctness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If qualia meanings were private, we'd have no way to distinguish genuine memory of a quale from false memory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Public language provides behavioral criteria that ground quale-terms in interpersonal practice, making them intelligible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Qualia have intrinsic phenomenal properties independent of how we linguistically express or communicate them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The argument conflates the privacy of subjective experience with the privacy of language; private experience doesn't entail private meaning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Public criteria may constrain quale-talk without grounding quale-concepts; internal ostensive definition can still succeed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    If qualia meanings were private, we'd have no way to distinguish genuine memory ...Interpersonal comparisons of qualia do not make sensePublic criteria may constrain quale-talk without grounding quale-concepts; inter...Public language provides behavioral criteria that ground quale-terms in interper...
    +3 moreShow less
    Qualia have intrinsic phenomenal properties independent of how we linguistically...The argument conflates the privacy of subjective experience with the privacy of ...Wittgenstein argues we cannot privately ostensively define sensations; meaning r...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit