Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Wittgenstein's rule-following argument establishes that m... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A speaker's intention figures into the overall function that determines the creation or maintenance of a linguistic convention

    Wittgenstein's rule-following argument establishes that meaning is fixed by public practice and training, not by any inner mental act of intending (Philosophical Investigations §§185-242).

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Inner mental act of intending(what Wittgenstein argues does NOT determine meaning)
    A private thought or decision happening only in your mind—for example, silently deciding in your head what a word means without telling anyone or showing it through behavior.
    Philosophical Investigations(as the source text being referenced)
    Wittgenstein's most influential book, published after his death, where he explores how language works through everyday examples and imaginary scenarios rather than abstract theory.
    Public practice(where Wittgenstein says meaning comes from)
    Things that a community of people do together and can observe in each other, like how English speakers all use the word 'dog' the same way when pointing at actual dogs.
    Rule-following argument(the main argument being described)
    Wittgenstein's famous reasoning that shows how we understand and follow rules (like the rules of language) through shared social practices and learning from others, not through private mental definitions we create in our own minds.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Wittgenstein
    Ludwig Wittgenstein was an Austrian-British philosopher who fundamentally changed how people think about language and meaning in the 20th century. He argued that many philosophical problems arise from misunderstanding how words actually work in everyday life, rather than from deep metaphysical mysteries. His ideas influenced not just philosophy but also mathematics, logic, and even how people approach psychology and artificial intelligence today.
    meaning(Possible-worlds semantic theory of meaning)
    A rule specifying what an expression would stand for if the world were a certain way, rather than what the expression actually stands for in the current circumstance
    §§185-242(as a reference to where in the text this argument is found)
    A citation showing specific section numbers in Wittgenstein's book where these ideas appear (the double § symbol means 'sections').

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    A speaker's intention figures into the overall function that determines the crea...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective