Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations establish that understanding is constituted by correct participation in practices, not by inner mental states inaccessible to behavioral verification.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Constituted by(describing what conditions would make something true): Made up of or determined by; in this case, what things would need to happen for something to count as true.
Wittgenstein: Ludwig Wittgenstein was an Austrian-British philosopher who fundamentally changed how people think about language and meaning in the 20th century. He argued that many philosophical problems arise from misunderstanding how words actually work in everyday life, rather than from deep metaphysical mysteries. His ideas influenced not just philosophy but also mathematics, logic, and even how people approach psychology and artificial intelligence today.
correct participation in practices(what Wittgenstein believed actually makes understanding happen): Doing an activity the right way along with other people—like following the actual rules of chess when you play with someone, not just imagining you're playing chess in your head.
inaccessible to behavioral verification(why inner mental states alone can't explain understanding)

Based on where you are in your exploration