Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Wolf's Reason View entails that an agent who could not have known or done otherwise lacks the authorship conditions for attributability, so circumstantial excuses already operate at the attributability level.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.An agent can meaningfully own morally defective reasoning even without alternatives; attributability tracks expression of values, not modal freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Circumstantial excuses (duress, coercion) operate by challenging responsibility-conditions like fair opportunity, distinct from attributability of action to agent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Wolf's view conflates epistemic/practical access with metaphysical authorship; agents can be attributed actions despite circumstantial ignorance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Attributability requires the agent's action to express their evaluative commitments, which demands minimal rational competence to know/do otherwise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If circumstantial constraints prevent knowing/doing otherwise, they undermine the rational authorship needed for the action to be theirs to own.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Distinguishing attributability from answerability at the excuse stage creates redundant filtering and obscures that rational agency itself requires alternatives.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42