Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Worthiness of worship is a relational, evaluative property imposed by worshippers, not an intrinsic metaphysical property constitutive of divinity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If worship-worthiness is merely projected by worshippers, then false or harmful worship practices become equally valid, undermining moral critique.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Divine omnipotence, perfection, and transcendence are intrinsic metaphysical properties that logically entail worthiness independent of observer opinion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Relational properties still require mind-independent grounds; calling worthiness 'relational' doesn't explain what grounds it if not divine nature itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Worship practices vary radically across cultures, suggesting worthiness depends on worshipper perspectives rather than objective divine properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If worthiness were intrinsic to divinity, beings with identical divine properties would deserve equal worship regardless of observer subjective states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Value and worthiness are paradigmatically relational—nothing is 'worthy' except relative to evaluative agents with specific standards and needs.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.