Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Wrongful exploitation requires both instrumentalization of vulnerability and domination

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Wertheimer's baseline account holds that exploitation is wrongful when one party gains through a transaction that falls below a fair market or hypothetical consent standard.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.This consent-based wrong obtains even in transactions between equals with no vulnerability instrumentalized and no domination exercised.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore domination is not a necessary condition for wrongful exploitation, contra the conjunctive requirement the claim asserts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Exploitation can be wrongful solely through unfair distribution of surplus value, without any instrumentalization of vulnerability (Roemer 1982).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A purely structural account of exploitation—where unjust benefit-extraction suffices for wrongfulness—makes domination and vulnerability conditions explanatorily redundant.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Instrumentalization of vulnerability is a necessary condition for wrongful exploitation
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Instrumentalization of vulnerability is not a sufficient condition for wrongful exploitation
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Wrongful exploitation obtains only when instrumentalization of vulnerability occurs in a manner involving domination
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42