Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    XL has recursive enumerability of validities — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→XL can have a strongly complete calculus

    XL has recursive enumerability of validities

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Proof of definition segments1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    These three properties together are sufficient for strong completenessXL can have a strongly complete calculusXL satisfies Compactness and Löwenheim-Skolem

    Similar

    The set of validities of XL is recursively enumerable95%A logic whose validities are recursively enumerable satisfies abstract...85%Without completeness, there exist semantic consequences that cannot be...80%Completeness of a language implies that its set of valid sentences is ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-many-sorted
    View source passageHide passage
    Namely, the set of validities of \(\XL\) is recursively enumerable. Therefore, \(\XL\) is complete in an abstract sense. Remark: So, we learn that a calculus for \(\XL\) is a natural demand, but we also learn that in MSL we can simulate such a calculus and then we could use a theorem prover for MSL. 5 Level Two: the Main Theorem When the \(\XL\) logic under scrutiny has a concept of logical consequence, we may try to prove the Main theorem; that is, that consequence in \(\XL\) (\(\Pi \models _

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective