Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Yet Kaplan finds biologists frequently treat genes as cau... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Despite publicly disavowing genetic determinism, biologists often implicitly adhere to a weaker form of genetic primacy, holding that traits are primarily (even if not wholly) genetic.

    Yet Kaplan finds biologists frequently treat genes as causally primary among the factors influencing traits.

    BioethicsCausation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Biologists disavow the strong 'intervention is useless' form of genetic determin...Despite publicly disavowing genetic determinism, biologists often implicitly adh...No adequate basis for this primacy of genes over non-genetic causes has been est...

    Similar

    Despite publicly disavowing genetic determinism, biologists often impl...82%No adequate basis for this primacy of genes over non-genetic causes ha...79%Context-dependence of genetic explanations undermines the claim that g...77%It is impossible to apportion the relative causal contributions of gen...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: human-genome
    View source passageHide passage
    Yet, DNA is still portrayed as fundamental: in a public lecture held in celebration of the completion of the HGP, Collins characterized the HGP as “an amazing adventure into ourselves, to understand our own DNA instruction book, the shared inheritance of all humankind.”[23] While virtually all biologists disavow genetic determinism today, it is not always so clear what exactly they are denying. Jonathan Kaplan (2000) identifies three different ways in which claims about genetic determinism migh

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective