Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    ZFC^2 either models CH or it does not — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Continuum Hypothesis is either true or false, even if we do not know which

    ZFC^2 either models CH or it does not

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    CH has a determinate truth value relative to the standard semantics of ZFC^2The Continuum Hypothesis is either true or false, even if we do not know whichThe models of ZFC^2 are, up to isomorphism, of the form (V_kappa, epsilon) where...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    In M', the same sentence θ_CH has no models, meaning M' does not model...79%What counts as the model are the model descriptions and their content,...77%There are no model objects; models only live in scientists' imaginatio...76%A model that lacks a property essential to what it models is not an ad...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-higher-order
    View source passageHide passage
    Since \(Z_2\) is a natural and sufficient environment for many mathematical theorems, it is an appropriate framework for answering questions raised by the reverse mathematics program. The main (but not the only) distinctions that are made in reverse mathematics concern the amount of the Comprehension Principle that is needed in proving this or that mathematical result. In particular, the role of Arithmetic and \(\Pi^1_1\)-Comprehension Principles is clarified. The basic theory of real numbers ca

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective