Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Anderson — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Anderson
    A

    Anderson

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    Anderson is a contemporary philosopher whose work engages with philosophy of mind and philosophy of language. The name is common in contemporary analytic philosophy, and without further disambiguation a precise scholarly identification is uncertain.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Contributed to debates on a priori deducibility and the explanatory gap in consciousness

    2

    Engaged with questions about discourse markers and coherence in language

    3

    Work situated within contemporary philosophy of mind

    Positions & Arguments(5)

    Justice & Punishment

    claim

    Gender inequality persists in access to elite positions in the economy and government.

    Rights & Liberty

    claim

    Gender inequality persists in access to elite positions in the economy and government.

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    5

    Topics

    5

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Philosophy of Language2
    Consciousness & Mind1
    Rights & Liberty1
    Skepticism

    The shared denotation of sentences (1) and (5) cannot be the propositions expressed by each sentence

    claim

    Discourse markers should be used appropriately in text generation to enhance coherence

    Skepticism

    claim

    CP2 — the claim that we are not justified in denying the skeptical hypothesis — cannot be supported by appealing to the undetectability of skeptical scenarios alone

    Consciousness & Mind

    claim

    Whether a priori deducibility from the explanans is sufficient for explaining consciousness depends in part on the nature of the premises from which the deduction proceeds

    1
    Justice & Punishment1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant5 sharedRené Descartes5 sharedDavid Hume5 sharedThomas Hobbes5 sharedGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz4 sharedDavid Lewis3 sharedAristotle3 sharedPlato3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Philosophy of Language→See Consciousness & Mind→