Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Brian Skyrms — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Brian Skyrms
    Brian Skyrms

    Brian Skyrms

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    b. 1938

    Brian Skyrms is an American philosopher of science known for his work on the evolution of social norms, game theory, probability, and inductive logic. He has made significant contributions to understanding how cooperation, signaling, and conventions can emerge through evolutionary dynamics without rational deliberation.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed evolutionary game-theoretic models of social contract formation in 'Evolution of the Social Contract'

    2

    Pioneered work on the evolution of signaling systems in 'Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information'

    3

    Advanced understanding of dynamic deliberation and the foundations of Bayesian reasoning

    4

    Contributed to formal epistemology through work on probability, coherence, and conditionalization

    5

    Distinguished Professor at UC Irvine and Professor of Philosophy at Stanford University

    Positions & Arguments(14)

    Skepticism

    claim

    The inference from premises (1)-(3) to the conclusion that grammar G is unlearnable from the pld (period) involves an equivocation

    claim

    The principle of maximum entropy is a more cautious and broadly applicable version of the Principle of Indifference.

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    Backward induction is self-undermining as a solution concept in certain extensive-form games

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    The inference from premises (1)-(3) to the conclusion that grammar G is unlearnable from the pld (period) involves an equivocation

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The replicator dynamics need not converge to an evolutionarily stable state.

    claim

    No-trace actualists cannot provide a standard compositional semantics for modal languages.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    The replicator dynamics need not converge to an evolutionarily stable state.

    claim

    The principle of maximum entropy is a more cautious and broadly applicable version of the Principle of Indifference.

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    Backward induction is self-undermining as a solution concept in certain extensive-form games

    Consequentialism

    premise

    A loss in one respect may be outweighed by a benefit in another

    premise

    Advantages not expressible in monetary terms can still be rationally decisive

    premise

    Approaching the truth faster—assigning probability above a threshold to the true hypothesis more quickly—is an advantage that should factor into choosing an inference rule

    premise

    Approaching the truth faster (assigning high probability to the true hypothesis more quickly) is a benefit not readily expressed in monetary terms but should be taken into account when choosing an inference rule

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Following a probabilistically incoherent rule is not necessarily irrational

    Causation

    premise

    A probabilistic version of abduction may perform better than Bayes' rule in our world by approaching the truth faster

    claim

    Probabilistic abduction may be preferable to Bayes' rule as an inference rule

    premise

    Probabilistic abduction approaches the truth faster than Bayes' rule on average in our world

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    14

    Topics

    7

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge12
    Consequentialism4
    Skepticism4
    Causation3
    Modality & Possibility2
    Philosophy of Language1
    Moral Responsibility1

    Related Thinkers

    Plato7 sharedImmanuel Kant6 sharedDavid Lewis6 sharedAristotle6 sharedRené Descartes6 sharedIsaac Newton6 sharedThomas Aquinas6 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Consequentialism→
    premise

    A loss in one respect may be outweighed by a benefit in another

    premise

    Advantages not expressible in monetary terms can still be rationally decisive

    claim

    Following a probabilistically incoherent rule is not necessarily irrational

    premise

    Approaching the truth faster—assigning probability above a threshold to the true hypothesis more quickly—is an advantage that should factor into choosing an inference rule

    premise

    A probabilistic version of abduction may perform better than Bayes' rule in our world by approaching the truth faster

    claim

    Probabilistic abduction may be preferable to Bayes' rule as an inference rule

    premise

    Approaching the truth faster (assigning high probability to the true hypothesis more quickly) is a benefit not readily expressed in monetary terms but should be taken into account when choosing an inference rule

    premise

    Probabilistic abduction approaches the truth faster than Bayes' rule on average in our world

    David Hume5 shared