Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Crispin Wright — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Crispin Wright
    CW

    Crispin Wright

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    b. 1942

    Crispin Wright (b. 1942) is a British analytic philosopher best known for his work in philosophy of mathematics, epistemology, and philosophy of language. He developed neo-logicism alongside Bob Hale as a rehabilitation of Fregean logicism, and his entitlement theory offers a non-evidential basis for epistemic warrant against skeptical challenges. He has also made significant contributions to the interpretation of Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations and to pluralist theories of truth.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed neo-logicism (with Bob Hale), rehabilitating Frege's program of grounding arithmetic in logic via abstraction principles

    2

    Articulated the 'entitlement' theory of epistemic warrant, providing a non-evidential justification for foundational presuppositions that block skeptical regress

    3

    Produced influential analysis of Wittgenstein's rule-following paradox and its implications for meaning and normativity

    4

    Developed a pluralist/minimalist account of truth via the concept of superassertibility

    5

    Founded the Arché Philosophical Research Centre at the University of St Andrews, a major hub for analytic philosophy

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    CP2 — the claim that we are not justified in denying the skeptical hypothesis — cannot be supported by appealing to the undetectability of skeptical scenarios alone

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    1

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    Boyd1 sharedRichard Braithwaite1 sharedStathis Psillos1 sharedDavid Lewis1 sharedBas van Fraassen1 sharedImmanuel Kant1 sharedPaul Teller1 sharedRené Descartes1 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Skepticism→