Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Edward Zalta — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Edward Zalta
    Edward Zalta

    Edward Zalta

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    b. 1952

    Edward Zalta is an American philosopher and senior research scholar at Stanford University, best known for developing axiomatic object theory, which provides a formal framework for reasoning about abstract and possible objects. He is also the founding editor and principal editor of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, one of the most important open-access reference works in philosophy.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed axiomatic object theory distinguishing encoding from exemplifying properties

    2

    Founded and serves as principal editor of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    3

    Formalized a comprehensive theory of abstract objects in 'Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics' (1983)

    4

    Advanced formal treatments of Platonic metaphysics using intensional logic

    5

    Contributed to the philosophy of mathematics through object-theoretic foundations

    Positions & Arguments(11)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    claim

    The truth of a proposition in a world does not entail that the proposition exists in that world

    premise

    Ordinary objects are defined as those that might be concrete.

    claim

    Possible objects such as million-carat diamonds and talking donkeys are not abstract.

    premise

    Possible objects are possibly concrete (not necessarily non-concrete).

    premise

    Abstract objects are defined as objects that are not ordinary.

    claim

    Abstract objects are not possibly concrete.

    premise

    Therefore, abstract objects, by definition, do not satisfy the condition of possibly being concrete.

    premise

    Abstract objects are those that couldn't be concrete.

    premise

    Therefore, possible objects fail to meet the defining condition of abstractness.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    claim

    The truth of a proposition in a world does not entail that the proposition exists in that world

    Consciousness & Mind

    claim

    Lowe's solution to Bradley's regress merely replaces one equally thorny problem with another

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    11

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Modality & Possibility10
    Truth & Knowledge2
    Consciousness & Mind1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedDavid Lewis3 sharedAristotle3 sharedPlato3 sharedBertrand Russell3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedRené Descartes3 sharedJohn Locke3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Modality & Possibility→See Truth & Knowledge→