Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    H. A. Prichard — Carmelics
    Thinkers/H. A. Prichard
    HA

    H. A. Prichard

    contemporaryBritish Moral Intuitionism / Oxford Realism

    1871 – 1947

    Harold Arthur Prichard (1871–1947) was a British philosopher at Oxford whose work in moral philosophy and epistemology proved foundational to twentieth-century analytic ethics. He is best known for challenging the presuppositions of traditional moral theory and for defending a rigorous form of deontological intuitionism. His essay 'Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?' (1912) redirected ethical inquiry by arguing that the demand to justify moral obligations through appeals to self-interest or the good was itself a category error.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Argued in 'Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?' that moral obligations are self-evident and cannot be derived from non-moral facts

    2

    Developed a strict deontological intuitionism holding that duty is irreducible to goodness or consequences

    3

    Formulated what became known as 'Prichard's Dilemma,' challenging consequentialist and virtue-based justifications of obligation

    4

    Contributed to Oxford realist epistemology, particularly on the relationship between knowledge, perception, and appearance

    5

    Influenced W. D. Ross and the broader British intuitionist tradition in twentieth-century ethics

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Natural Theology

    claim

    The ontological argument's claim that God necessarily exists cannot be sustained, because there are no propositions that are both necessary and existential.

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The ontological argument's claim that God necessarily exists cannot be sustained, because there are no propositions that are both necessary and existential.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    British Moral Intuitionism / Oxford Realism

    Topic Influence

    Modality & Possibility1
    Natural Theology1

    Related Thinkers

    Zalta2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedPlato2 sharedAristotle2 sharedRudolf Carnap2 sharedDavid Hilbert2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Modality & Possibility→See Natural Theology→