Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    J.N. Findlay — Carmelics
    Thinkers/J.N. Findlay
    JF

    J.N. Findlay

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy / British Idealism

    1903 – 1987

    John Niemeyer Findlay (1903–1987) was a South African-born British philosopher known for his synthetic engagement with analytic philosophy, Kantian criticism, and German Idealism. He made significant contributions to value theory, philosophy of mind, and the interpretation of Hegel and Meinong, and is perhaps best remembered for his 1948 paper arguing for an ontological disproof of God's existence, a position he later revised.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Argued for an ontological disproof of divine existence in 'Can God's Existence Be Disproved?' (1948), sparking major debate in analytic philosophy of religion

    2

    Authored 'Hegel: A Re-examination' (1958), a landmark rehabilitation of Hegel for anglophone audiences

    3

    Produced influential scholarly work on Alexius Meinong's theory of objects

    4

    Developed a neo-Platonic value theory in 'Axiological Ethics' (1970)

    5

    Contributed to Kant scholarship, particularly on transcendental idealism and the theory of space

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The contradiction between the self and the not-self can be resolved rather than forcing us to reject both sides and start over.

    claim

    Allison's premise (6) is too weak to be a plausible reconstruction of Kant's non-spatiality thesis

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    The contradiction between the self and the not-self can be resolved rather than forcing us to reject both sides and start over.

    Perception

    claim

    Allison's premise (6) is too weak to be a plausible reconstruction of Kant's non-spatiality thesis

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy / British Idealism

    Topic Influence

    Modality & Possibility2
    Truth & Knowledge1
    Perception1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedAristotle3 sharedPlato3 sharedBertrand Russell3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedRené Descartes3 sharedIsaac Newton3 sharedBaruch Spinoza3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Modality & Possibility→See Truth & Knowledge→