Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    John Nash — Carmelics
    Thinkers/John Nash
    John Nash

    John Nash

    contemporaryGame Theory / Mathematical Economics

    1928 – 2015

    John Forbes Nash Jr. was an American mathematician whose work on game theory, differential geometry, and partial differential equations transformed economics and the mathematical sciences. His formulation of the Nash equilibrium provided the foundational solution concept for non-cooperative games and earned him the 1994 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Formulated the Nash equilibrium as a solution concept for non-cooperative games

    2

    Awarded the 1994 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences

    3

    Proved the Nash embedding theorems in differential geometry

    4

    Received the 2015 Abel Prize for work on nonlinear partial differential equations

    5

    Developed foundational results in bargaining theory (the Nash bargaining solution)

    Positions & Arguments

    (3)

    Social Contract

    claim

    Segmented choice in contractualist models of agreement can produce outcomes that are not rationalizable to the contracting parties

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The replicator dynamics need not converge to an evolutionarily stable state.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    The replicator dynamics need not converge to an evolutionarily stable state.

    claim

    Backward induction is self-undermining as a solution concept in certain extensive-form games

    Skepticism

    claim

    Backward induction is self-undermining as a solution concept in certain extensive-form games

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    3

    Topics

    4

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Game Theory / Mathematical Economics

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Social Contract1
    Modality & Possibility1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Hume4 sharedDavid Lewis3 sharedImmanuel Kant3 sharedBrian Skyrms3 sharedAristotle3 sharedBertrand Russell3 sharedPlato3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Social Contract→
    Stathis Psillos3 shared