Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Ken Binmore — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Ken Binmore
    Ken Binmore

    Ken Binmore

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy / Game Theory

    b. 1940

    Ken Binmore is a British mathematician, economist, and philosopher known for foundational contributions to game theory and its application to moral and political philosophy. He has developed influential analyses of bargaining, social contract theory, and the epistemic foundations of rational choice, and served as a key architect of the UK 3G spectrum auction.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a naturalistic game-theoretic reconstruction of the social contract in Natural Justice and Game Theory and the Social Contract

    2

    Produced influential critiques of backward induction and common knowledge of rationality in extensive-form games

    3

    Designed the UK 3G telecom spectrum auction, raising approximately 22.5 billion pounds

    4

    Authored widely used texts on game theory, including Playing for Real and Fun and Games

    5

    Advanced an empirically grounded theory of fairness rooted in evolutionary and bargaining considerations

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Social Contract

    claim

    Segmented choice in contractualist models of agreement can produce outcomes that are not rationalizable to the contracting parties

    Skepticism

    claim

    Backward induction is self-undermining as a solution concept in certain extensive-form games

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Backward induction is self-undermining as a solution concept in certain extensive-form games

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy / Game Theory

    Topic Influence

    Social Contract1
    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Hume3 sharedMartin Heidegger3 sharedAdam Smith3 sharedCass Sunstein3 sharedDavid Miller3 sharedJohn Nash3 sharedFrancesco Guala3 sharedH. Peyton Young3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Social Contract→See Truth & Knowledge→