Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Liu — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Liu
    L

    Liu

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    Liu is a contemporary philosopher working on game theory and formal epistemology, with particular focus on the interpretation of plausibility updates in sequential games. Their work examines how rational agents revise beliefs during actual play versus in theoretical analysis.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Analyzed plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play

    2

    Distinguished interpretive frameworks for plausibility in game-theoretic contexts

    3

    Contributed to formal epistemology of dynamic belief revision

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Skepticism

    claim

    The inference from premises (1)-(3) to the conclusion that grammar G is unlearnable from the pld (period) involves an equivocation

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Skepticism2
    Truth & Knowledge1
    Philosophy of Language1

    Related Thinkers

    The inference from premises (1)-(3) to the conclusion that grammar G is unlearnable from the pld (period) involves an equivocation

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    David Lewis
    3 shared
    Immanuel Kant3 shared
    Bertrand Russell3 shared
    Brian Skyrms3 shared
    David Hume3 shared
    Stathis Psillos3 shared
    Aristotle3 shared
    Bas van Fraassen3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Skepticism→See Truth & Knowledge→