Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Nelson Goodman — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Nelson Goodman
    NG

    Nelson Goodman

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    1906 – 1998

    Nelson Goodman (1906-1998) was an influential American analytic philosopher known for his work in logic, philosophy of science, epistemology, and aesthetics. He is best known for formulating the 'new riddle of induction' (the grue paradox) and developing a nominalist, constructivist approach to worldmaking.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford EncyclopediaIEPInternet Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Formulated the 'new riddle of induction' (grue paradox) in Fact, Fiction, and Forecast

    2

    Developed constructive nominalism and the theory of worldmaking in Ways of Worldmaking

    3

    Authored Languages of Art, a foundational work in analytic aesthetics

    4

    Co-developed the calculus of individuals (mereology) with H.S. Leonard

    5

    Advanced irrealism and the rejection of a single privileged description of reality

    Positions & Arguments(3)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    Metric geometry is neither true nor false.

    claim

    The apparent multiplication of word-tokens from a single inscription based on different readings is not a genuine mereological multiplication of entities

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Metric geometry is neither true nor false.

    claim

    We can rationally believe both ourselves and God to be mental in nature from a practical point of view.

    Natural Theology

    claim

    We can rationally believe both ourselves and God to be mental in nature from a practical point of view.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    3

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Modality & Possibility2
    Natural Theology1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedAristotle3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedBertrand Russell3 sharedPlato3 sharedRené Descartes3 sharedRudolf Carnap3 sharedDavid Hilbert3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Modality & Possibility→