Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Robert Fogelin — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Robert Fogelin
    RF

    Robert Fogelin

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Neo-Pyrrhonian Skepticism

    1932 – 2016

    Robert Fogelin (1932–2016) was an American analytic philosopher at Dartmouth College known for reviving neo-Pyrrhonian skepticism and for sustained engagement with Hume and Wittgenstein. His work spans epistemology, philosophy of religion, and the limits of rational argument, consistently probing the grounds on which philosophical and theological claims can be established.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a contemporary neo-Pyrrhonian skepticism synthesizing Hume and Wittgenstein in 'Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification' (1994)

    2

    Authored an influential commentary on Wittgenstein's 'Philosophical Investigations'

    3

    Wrote 'Walking the Tightrope of Reason' (2003), examining the precarious foundations of rational inquiry

    4

    Produced critical analyses of probabilistic and evidential arguments for theism

    5

    Contributed to the study of Hume's 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion' and its skeptical implications

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Natural Theology

    claim

    We can rationally believe both ourselves and God to be mental in nature from a practical point of view.

    claim

    The objection that probabilistic arguments are only of interest when founded on all relevant available evidence is not a legitimate objection against confirmatory probabilistic arguments

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    We can rationally believe both ourselves and God to be mental in nature from a practical point of view.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Neo-Pyrrhonian Skepticism

    Topic Influence

    Natural Theology2
    Truth & Knowledge1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedAristotle2 sharedPlato2 sharedRené Descartes2 sharedDavid Hilbert2 sharedG.W.F. Hegel2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Natural Theology→See Truth & Knowledge→