Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    T.M. Scanlon — Carmelics
    Thinkers/T.M. Scanlon
    T.M. Scanlon

    T.M. Scanlon

    contemporaryContractualism, Analytic Philosophy

    b. 1940

    Thomas Michael Scanlon is an American moral philosopher known for his contractualist ethical theory, which holds that an action is wrong if it would be disallowed by principles that no one could reasonably reject. A longtime professor at Harvard University, he has made major contributions to moral and political philosophy, particularly on the nature of reasons, responsibility, and the foundations of morality.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed contractualism as a moral theory in 'What We Owe to Each Other' (1998)

    2

    Articulated the distinction between moral wrongness and other normative concepts like harm and blame

    3

    Advanced influential accounts of tolerance, free expression, and the significance of choice

    4

    Published 'Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame' (2008) analyzing moral responsibility

    5

    Shaped contemporary metaethics through his work on reasons, values, and rational agency

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    claim

    Harmful conduct and wrongdoing are distinguishable concepts

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    Justice & Punishment

    claim

    Harmful conduct and wrongdoing are distinguishable concepts

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Contractualism, Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Moral Responsibility2
    Truth & Knowledge1
    Justice & Punishment1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedG.W.F. Hegel3 sharedThomas Hobbes3 sharedGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz3 sharedAlvin Goldman3 sharedFrank Jackson3 sharedGeorg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Moral Responsibility→See Truth & Knowledge→