Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Thomas — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Thomas
    T

    Thomas

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    Thomas is a contemporary philosopher whose work in our database engages with game-theoretic epistemology, particularly the interpretation of plausibility updates during sequential games. Their contributions focus on distinguishing the epistemic status of in-play belief revision from off-play theoretical analysis.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Analyzed plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play

    2

    Distinguished in-play from off-play interpretations of belief revision

    3

    Contributed to game-theoretic epistemology

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The replicator dynamics need not converge to an evolutionarily stable state.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    The replicator dynamics need not converge to an evolutionarily stable state.

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Modality & Possibility1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    David Lewis
    3 shared
    Immanuel Kant3 shared
    Brian Skyrms3 shared
    Aristotle3 shared
    Bertrand Russell3 shared
    David Hume3 shared
    Plato3 shared
    Stathis Psillos3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Modality & Possibility→