Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Timothy Williamson — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Timothy Williamson
    TW

    Timothy Williamson

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    b. 1955

    Timothy Williamson is a British philosopher best known for his work in epistemology, philosophical logic, and metaphysics. He is the Wykeham Professor of Logic at the University of Oxford and has defended knowledge-first epistemology, the view that knowledge is conceptually prior to belief and justification.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed knowledge-first epistemology in Knowledge and Its Limits (2000)

    2

    Defended epistemicism about vagueness in Vagueness (1994)

    3

    Advanced modal logic and necessitism in Modal Logic as Metaphysics (2013)

    4

    Argued against the KK principle (knowing that one knows)

    5

    Wykeham Professor of Logic at the University of Oxford

    Positions & Arguments

    (7)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    claim

    Boyd's abductive argument for scientific methodology's reliability still stands

    claim

    A priori justification is similar to, but significantly different from, a posteriori justification

    claim

    Testimonial justification can be generated through a chain of testimony even when the transmitting testifier lacks justified belief

    Skepticism

    claim

    Boyd's abductive argument for scientific methodology's reliability still stands

    claim

    CP2 — the claim that we are not justified in denying the skeptical hypothesis — cannot be supported by appealing to the undetectability of skeptical scenarios alone

    claim

    The preface paradox pressures Kyburg to extend his tolerance of joint inconsistency to the acceptance of contradictions.

    Perception

    claim

    A priori justification is similar to, but significantly different from, a posteriori justification

    Consciousness & Mind

    claim

    Lowe's solution to Bradley's regress merely replaces one equally thorny problem with another

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    7

    Topics

    5

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge4
    Skepticism3
    Consciousness & Mind1
    Modality & Possibility1
    Perception1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant5 sharedAristotle5 sharedPlato5 sharedBertrand Russell5 sharedDavid Hume5 sharedRené Descartes5 sharedJohn Locke5 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→
    P.F. Strawson5 shared