Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A being essentially and eternally omnipotent cannot be affected by or genuinely related to contingent creatures, undermining the relational personhood essential to Trinitarian theology.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Omnipotence may include the power to self-limit; voluntary constraint on omnipotence for relational purposes doesn't contradict omnipotence itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Relation doesn't require symmetrical dependence; a parent genuinely relates to a child despite asymmetrical power and independence conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.God's atemporality allows God to be 'affected' in a timeless way; divine knowledge of all contingencies constitutes genuine relation without temporal causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If X is omnipotent, X cannot be affected by what X does not control; contingent creatures fall outside divine control by definition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Genuine relation requires mutual dependence; an eternal being depends on nothing, so relations with contingents cannot be genuinely reciprocal.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Trinitarian personhood requires internal relations; if God cannot be affected by creatures, divine persons relate only to each other, not externally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.