Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A belief-forming process that validates its own infallibi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Fischer's bootstrapping account of divine foreknowledge fails.

    A belief-forming process that validates its own infallibility via the outputs of that very process exemplifies the 'easy knowledge' problem Vogel and Cohen identify in epistemic circularity.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Belief-forming process(epistemology)
    The method or mechanism by which you come to believe something, like using your senses, reasoning, or relying on what others tell you.
    Easy knowledge problem(the specific problem being referenced)
    A philosophical puzzle about how certain 'shortcuts' to knowledge might seem to give us understanding too easily, without doing the real work of justifying our beliefs.
    Vogel and Cohen(the thinkers credited with identifying this problem)
    Philosophers who studied how we know things and identified problems with circular reasoning in the process of gaining knowledge.
    epistemic circularity(Alston's argument that all doxastic practices, including sense-perception, share this feature)
    The condition in which the reliability of a doxastic practice cannot be established by any means independent of the practice itself.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    infallibility(Used by Mill to characterize the epistemic error made by those who would suppress beliefs they take to be false or harmful)
    The assumption that one's own judgment about the truth or falsity of a belief cannot be mistaken
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.
    validate(what conventionalism would be forced to do)
    To officially accept or confirm something as correct, legitimate, or true.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linked

    Related

    Fischer's bootstrapping account of divine foreknowledge fails.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective