Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Free Will & Foreknowledge — Carmelics
    Topics/Metaphysics & Ontology/Free Will & Foreknowledge

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    The tension between human freedom and divine omniscience

    1,677 ideas in this topic

    519 of 1677 ideas have perspectives(31%)

    1,677 results

    Some graces are inefficacious

    55%
    claim

    A decision that bypasses the ordeal of undecidability is not a free decision

    70%
    claim

    A free will must be physically and psychologically unforced in its operation.

    70%
    claim

    A high correlation between Houdini's predictions and outcomes can exist even when Houdini abstains in cases of intervention, because the abstentions themselves correlate with the prevention of outcomes.

    70%
    claim

    A human being is not endowed with freedom in the ordinary sense of the term.

    70%
    claim

    A naïve trust in the independence of the will is undermined

    ?
    claim

    A person at a deterministic world can have the ability to act such that some law of nature that does obtain would not obtain, without requiring magical powers.

    70%
    claim

    A person has no power over a consequent fact

    70%
    claim

    A person is free to endeavor to make p happen

    70%
    claim

    A person may be morally responsible for an action despite lacking any ability to do otherwise

    70%
    claim

    A person who feels guilt about a past action is (or was) free in Kant's sense

    70%
    claim

    A person who sincerely accepts mechanistic determinism as the literal truth about themselves cannot coherently believe they are a moral agent.

    70%
    claim

    A physicalist cannot successfully account for free will by identifying it with having a temperature of 37.4º C.

    70%
    claim

    A player can benefit from having their own future options constrained by another player's commitment device.

    70%
    claim

    A player's choice can still be free even when a fortune teller accurately predicts the outcome of that choice.

    70%
    claim

    A player's decision is free even under eternalism, provided the decision is not causally determined.

    70%
    claim

    A player's decision is not as free under eternalism as it would be if the future were ontologically open.

    ?
    claim

    A rational agent's recognition of a reason entails the presence of a relevant desire

    70%
    claim

    A rational agent's voluntary response to a reason cannot consist in behavior motivated by a desire caused by recognizing that reason

    ?
    claim

    A rational will must act under the Idea of its own freedom

    70%
    claim

    A simpler centered incompatibilist account may fare just as well as Kane's indeterminist account against the argument from luck

    70%
    claim

    A successful Ockhamist response to theological fatalism need not await the definitive formulation of necessary and sufficient conditions for soft facthood.

    55%
    claim

    A true prophecy about the contingent future could have been false, even though the past existence of the prophecy is necessary after the fact.

    70%
    claim

    A true proposition belongs to God's free knowledge if and only if it is a contingent truth within God's control

    70%
    claim

    A will that cannot exercise itself except under the Idea of its freedom is free from a practical point of view.

    70%
    claim

    AP1, AP2, and AP3 represent genuine alternative possibilities for Spinoza

    70%
    claim

    Actions brought about by motivations internal to the agent are self-determined

    70%
    claim

    Adam and Eve shared the same psychological faculties, teleology, and moral freedom

    70%
    claim

    Aesthetic and teleological judgment together offer a solution to the problem of how free moral choice can be efficacious within the phenomenal world.

    70%
    claim

    Affirmations of free will in fatalistic scenarios may still be consistent with source compatibilism

    70%
    claim

    Thinkers in this topic

    Kenny4David Hume3Aristotle2Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz2
    Roderick Chisholm
    2
    Agnieszka Jaworska1
    Al-Ghazali1
    Alfred Mele1
    Alfred Tarski1
    Arthur Prior1
    Arthur Prior1
    Augustus de Morgan1

    Glossary

    knowledge

    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    free will

    An exemption from the laws of nature; the power of doing and forbearing

    agent

    The party in a principal-agent relationship who is instructed to produce the good or service on the principal's behalf — in the medical context, the doctor

    moral responsibility

    A normative concept whose scope is contested; the passage implies it encompasses at least Kantian notions (centered on individual rational agency) and other notions (potentially sociological, collective, or non-individualist in character)

    determinism

    A property of physical theories concerning whether the laws governing a system fully fix future (and past) states given present conditions; admits of degrees ('fall only a bit short')

    ability to do otherwise

    The capacity of an agent, at the point of action with all circumstances held constant, to have acted differently than they did.

    compatibilism

    The philosophical position that free will and moral responsibility are compatible with determinism being true

    deterministic

    Operating under the principle that every event is caused by prior events in an unbreakable chain, leaving no room for genuine freedom or choice.

    Related Topics

    Afterlife & Death1014Consciousness & Mind8130Personal Identity3098Causation7154Modality & Possibility13300Aesthetics2750

    Connected Topics

    Topics that share ideas with Free Will & Foreknowledge

    Moral Responsibility734 sharedModality & Possibility178 sharedCausation163 sharedDivine Attributes112 sharedTruth & Knowledge71 sharedConsciousness & Mind52 sharedVirtue Ethics26 sharedRights & Liberty20 shared

    Help Build This Topic

    1158 propositions still need supporting arguments.