Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A believer is not justified in believing a fairy tale mer... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Coherence is not sufficient for epistemic justification

    A believer is not justified in believing a fairy tale merely because the fairy tale is internally coherent

    Perception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Perception

    Related

    A belief system could be internally coherent while being entirely isolated from ...A sufficiently detailed and cleverly constructed fairy tale could be highly inte...Coherence is not sufficient for epistemic justificationIf coherence were sufficient for justification, then the fairy tale beliefs woul...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If coherence were sufficient for justification, then the fairy tale be...85%A sufficiently detailed and cleverly constructed fairy tale could be h...78%Empiricism treats believing or judging as too closely analogous to see...71%Experiential justification of beliefs is not exhausted by what is cons...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: perception-episprob
    View source passageHide passage
    Coherentism has traditionally been propounded as a doxastic theory: one that holds that only beliefs can serve as evidence. This is in part because one of the major motivations for coherentism derives from an argument due to Wilfrid Sellars (1956), Donald Davidson (1986) and Laurence BonJour (1980) that purports to show that nondoxastic states (e.g., experiences) cannot play an evidential role (about which, more below, in section 3.4.1). This doxasticism is the source of one of the most notori

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective