Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A blind person may live as well as a sighted person not b... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→McMahan's argument that disability effects are additive rests on a mistaken assumption.

    A blind person may live as well as a sighted person not because the blind person develops better hearing, but because the blind person's remaining capacities are sufficient for a full and rich life.

    BioethicsConsciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsConsciousness & Mind

    Key Terms

    Capacities(as what the soul possesses)
    Abilities or powers something has—the potential to do something (like how your brain has the capacity for both sensing and thinking).
    Full and rich life(as used in ethics and philosophy of wellbeing)
    A meaningful, satisfying existence with good experiences, relationships, and accomplishments—not just surviving, but truly flourishing.
    Implicit argument about disability and compensation

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as used in disability philosophy)
    The unstated assumption that people with disabilities automatically must develop extraordinary abilities in other areas (like blind people having superhearing) to live well—which this statement challenges.
    Sufficient
    # Sufficient Something is sufficient when it is enough to achieve a goal or make something true. For example, having a valid driver's license is sufficient to legally drive a car—you don't need anything else. In everyday language, we use "sufficient" to mean "adequate" or "meeting the minimum requirement needed."

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility2 linked

    Related

    McMahan's argument assumes that the possibility of living as well without as wit...McMahan's argument that disability effects are additive rests on a mistaken assu...The possibility of flourishing with a single disability may depend not on compen...

    Similar

    The possibility of flourishing with a single disability may depend not...73%Favoring a non-disabled individual B over a disabled individual A is a...71%In some circumstances, lacking a capacity like hearing leads to only a...71%For a utilitarian consequentialist, there is no a priori reason to thi...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: disability-health
    View source passageHide passage
    Some might dispute McMahan’s claim that disabilities cannot be neutral in combination, but our focus here is his claim that neutrality for individual disabilities implies neutrality in combination. In support of this claim, he argues the effects of disabilities on well-being “are largely additive”, because with each further disability, it becomes harder to compensate for other disabilities. This argument assumes that the possibility of living as well without as with any given ability depends on

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective