Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The possibility of flourishing with a single disability m... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→McMahan's argument that disability effects are additive rests on a mistaken assumption.

    The possibility of flourishing with a single disability may depend not on compensation but on saturation — that the remaining senses and abilities are more than adequate for full flourishing.

    BioethicsConsciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsConsciousness & Mind

    Key Terms

    Flourishing(the positive state that might be prevented by MPS)
    A state of living well and reaching your full potential as a person; achieving excellence in how you live.
    compensation(McMahan's implicit model for how neutrality of a disability is possible; contested by the saturation account.)
    The mechanism by which a person without a particular ability develops or relies on other abilities to make up for its absence, thereby maintaining comparable well-being.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    saturation(Offered as an alternative to the compensation model for explaining how a person with a disability can live as well as a person without that disability.)
    The condition in which the senses and abilities a person retains are more than adequate to allow that person to live as fully and richly as possible, such that flourishing does not depend on compensating for an absent ability.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility2 linked

    Related

    A blind person may live as well as a sighted person not because the blind person...McMahan's argument assumes that the possibility of living as well without as wit...McMahan's argument that disability effects are additive rests on a mistaken assu...

    Similar

    The absence of disability or disease does not guarantee psychophysical...80%Local hardships associated with disability may be absorbed in the imme...78%Treating lower capacity to benefit as a priori reflects the prejudice ...77%McMahan's argument assumes that the possibility of living as well with...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: disability-health
    View source passageHide passage
    Some might dispute McMahan’s claim that disabilities cannot be neutral in combination, but our focus here is his claim that neutrality for individual disabilities implies neutrality in combination. In support of this claim, he argues the effects of disabilities on well-being “are largely additive”, because with each further disability, it becomes harder to compensate for other disabilities. This argument assumes that the possibility of living as well without as with any given ability depends on

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective